Mother Winter and Mother Summer are either Type 2 with hints of 6 and 9, or are merely so bound by, The Erlking is also considered to be of this alignment. In fact, it's his habitually torturing criminals that is also why he's in-between good and evil. The Marvel Cinematic Universe version of the character seems to have settled into this by the end of the movie. They're out for their own and do not like to get involved if at all possible with either good or evil, but again will usually side with the former if forced. Big also qualifies, generally wanting to be alone. The chart below shows how True Neutral views itself and the other eight alignments. Initially he's pretty content to just do whatever the Organization tells him to do and doesn't really think for himself all that much. Initially he's pretty content to just do whatever the Organization tells him to do and doesn't really think for himself all that much. Mostly he's just a sleaze, but not quite evil in my mind. Pure Goods can be Neutral good if they display no corrupting qualitiesand everything they do is for everyone's benefit and well-being (e.g. Thanks! In the original Arabian Night, where his story is more akin to winning the lottery, rather than about a well-meaning underdog who stops the villain and saves the day. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. They see lawfuls as overly strict and rigid while chaotics are viewed as overly lax and inconsistent. But outside of that he doesn't really do all that much. True Neutral Characters in Pop Culture. This entry is two characters in one, since Karin and Yuzu are fairly similar. Neutral evil characters have no such qualms about burning bridges if the reward is great enough. He comes out of retirement every so often to face an unambiguous crisis, but beyond that he prefers to keep to himself. True Neutral makes a good 'transition' alignment if a Neutral Evil character is going through some serious Character Development, they may reach a point where they're not doing so much evil, but not consistently doing good just yet either, and similarly when they do have something they want done, have no particular preference on whether to do it by obeying rules or breaking them. In the Jump/Final Ending, Deadeus reveals itself to be this. Chaotic neutral is the best alignment you can be because it represents true freedom from both society's restrictions and a do-gooder's zeal. He certainly doesn't have any particularly strong moral convictions. horde which is large and strong enough to rampage throughout the galaxy. (1). Advanced Dungeons and Dragons Dungeon Master's Guide. Though Mortal Kombat considers him to be a good character, as I said above neutral characters can and will side with good against evil if the occasion calls for it. True Neutrals may still Default to Good, because often it's just blatant how nasty the evil side is. True neutral individuals do not lack interest, ambition, or passion--they value their own well-being and that of friends and loved ones. Probably in-between this and Neutral Good in the end. They do this by playing pranks and being insulting sometimes. Equivalent alignment in other game systems: Neutral (Warhammer), Apathetic, Worldly, and Conformist (Alternity). After the finale it can be seen that he keeps the same personality, but behaves in a much friendlier manner. He just as easily makes friends with the, Goblins, who regard the main conflict in the series as "a wizard's war" and therefore not concerning them. They don't want to go out and be good or evil but rather just keep to themselves in the Shire. The alignments fall under nine different categories; lawful good, neutral good . And she's not really any worse than the Punisher, who I consider to be of Neutral alignment so 2023 GAMESPOT, A FANDOM COMPANY. They are a primarily self-interested and largely loyal-less species that are not all that good or evil, instead being most concerned with turning a profit for themselves. THIS SHOULD BE WORKING NOW, REPORT ANY ISSUES TO. Is not concerned with politics, most likely. June 1979: 23. 9. They're not particularly malevolent, but they ain't helping the Republic for any idealistic reasons either. This is the ultimate guide to famous Lawful Neutral fictional characters from anime and manga. In Second Edition all True Neutral people were stated to be type 4, and the player's guide definition explains that they always side with the underdog, and sometimes swap sides when one is winning. Ethical neutrals view both lawfuls and chaotics as extreme. 8. On works pages: Character Alignment is only to be used in works where it is canonical, and only for characters who have alignments in-story. He responds well to higher authority until that authority attempts to use the law to hamper his ability to pursue his own self-interest. Manage all your favorite fandoms in one place! The Marvel Cinematic Universe version of the character seems to have settled into this by the end of the movie. True Neutral characters can seem somewhat selfish, but they can also seem rather happy-go-lucky in comparison to more responsible characters. Power? While he remains largely self-interested, he also comes to care about Elizabeth to a degree and rarely if ever hurts innocent Columbia civilians, and is thus not completely without a conscience. Usually though more Neutral Good or, at his most obnoxious, Chaotic Neutral. Obviously not the Lizard himself, but Curt Connors tends to be either this or Neutral Good. Most of the time, these characters are seen keeping balance or simply not caring. Thing is though, Cage found that his conscience more often than not didn't allow him to act that way and he ultimately became more Neutral Good/Chaotic Good, including as a member of the New Avengers. Bad idea, that. When dealing with the examples of specific characters, remember that assigning an alignment to a character who doesn't come with one is pretty subjective. Like any True Neutral character, he adheres to his own ideals . As a blank slate, the Nameless One, the amnesiac protagonist, starts out. You shall not betray others unless your life is in jeopardy. Another admittedly controversial call. They do not wish ill on those they do not know, but they also do not care when they hear of evil befalling them. You shall advance yourself without harming others. More Neutral Evil in "The Last Wish", but otherwise the morally gray sorceress of the lodge fits this rather well. The true neutral character understands that more benefit for the self can be garnered by behaving altruistically sometimes, especially when they have been the beneficiaries of the altruistic behavior of others. Luigi,Izuku Midoriya, Android 16, Link, Quasimodo, Spider-Man (MCU),Batman (The Batman), Gandalf, Wander, DJ, Sierra Obenauer, Courage, Gizmo, andHiccup). He leans a little towards Chaotic Neutral due to him dropping the title. Chaotic neutral and true neutral characters have a similar moral outlook. 10 Geralt Of Rivia- True Neutral (Without Player Intervention) A true neutral may take up the cause of his nation, not because he necessarily feels obligated to do so, but because it just makes sense to support the group that protects your way of life. "I am not altogether on anybody's side, because nobody is altogether on my side". Given that she's in a way an extension of Roxas their sharing an alignment (and similar alignment transition) is fitting. Although true neutral and neutral evil characters are both primarily interested in their own advancement and welfare, neutral evil characters ruthlessly pursue their self-interest, even at the expense of others. But outside of sometimes uniting with Earthrealm's main defenders against a common enemy Kenshi's main goal is neither altruistic nor malevolent: it is simply revenge against Shang Tsung for blinding him. Gaz: But he's so bad at it. Both of these types will tend to return the treatment they receive from others. For example, once the strong evil forces in an area have been conquered, and the balance restored, the true neutral character will stop acting "good." Krusty tends to be depicted as being pretty crooked and sleazy, but is also not without a sympathetic side and compared to the actions of say, Mr. Burns, Sideshow Bob, Snake, and others, his criminal acts are pretty tame. You shall aid those who aid you and harm those who harm you. An honorable action is one that is in keeping with the spirit of this alignment, while dishonorable actions tend to be those which bring shame to the character in the eyes of his or her alignment peers. And much of it is a plot version of, He seems to work for the government, is sent to rescue a well-to-do in danger and, when it turns out she was taking part in orchestrating Death Watch, Jack may have struck her, but he notably didn't kill her (although he expressed regret at sparing her). Dr. Schlock, at least until about 2007. Garfield. This is because some true neutral beings look far beyond the immediate situation to the overall balance of the cosmos. God (Since God being Neutral in many stories and being above good and evil. Trending pages I just can't---Ferb? Neither good nor evil. In essence True Neutral characters are a more mild and innocent Neutral Evil in that they are chiefly self-interested, but not to a ruthless, cruel, or well, evil degree. Here are some possible adjectives describing true neutral characters: diplomatic, judgmental, enigmatic, aloof, distant, self-reliant, mediatory, even-handed, fair, indifferent, and impartial. Better for others to suffer the evil than the true neutral and his allies. That being said, they're arguably the best of heroes. This list is given in the order of least severe infraction to most severe. For the rest, they do not care. He even flat-out says at one point that he "blows with the wind. Between that and his animal-level or near-animal level intelligence and I'd say he fits this pretty well. Really he'd much rather prefer to just be simulating etiquette. The USSR sends Soviet spy, Bronislav Antonovich Ivaniv, who takes the name of 'Joseph Smith Miller' or Joseph for short, to the UK to gather intel from a NATO military base that resides in Mt. Note that an action which is considered honorable by one alignment may be considered dishonorable by another alignment and vice versa. This way, if we're struggling with how . They're out for. Either this or Chaotic Neutral, being a cold-blooded and remorseless seeker of vengeance who doesn't care who she kills in the process of attaining her goals. 2. Bart Simpson. This alignment is the narrowest in scope. (2), True neutral is typically the most misunderstood of all alignments. Most true neutral characters will, throughout their lives, tend more or less toward one of the other alignments, dependent upon their perception of the state of the world and what force should be balanced. By the character alignment name, one should not be fooled. An individual who is completely apathetic and ambivalent to the greater world and only gets involved because his girlfriend asked him to. If you have a difficulty deciding which alignment a neutral-aligned character belongs to, the main difference between Lawful Neutral, True Neutral and Chaotic Neutral is not their lack of devotion to either good or evil, but the methods they believe are best to show it: Compare Crowning Moment of Indifference. Oliver May of MS Igloo is probably an example, too. The MCU version is either this or Chaotic Neutral. Taking sides in a conflict that doesn't affect your survival. Obviously not the Lizard himself, but Curt Connors tends to be either this or Neutral Good. (3), A true neutral character will keep his word if in his best interest. He is devoted to helping others. Neutral Good- A neutral good character does the best that a good person can do. He is not without his moments of kindness though, and his victims aren't exactly sympathetic, so George R.R. While he certainly has his heroic moments by and large C-3PO is very neurotic and not at all interested in involving himself in dangerous and chaotic conflicts. True Neutral: Big Boss (Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes), Mad Max (Mad Max - but it varies), Tyrion Lannister (Game of Thrones), John Wick (John Wick) Chaotic Neutral: Han Solo (Star Wars Episode IV), Venom Snake (Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain), The Incredible Hulk (Incredible Hulk), John Constantine (Hellblazer) comments Is not concerned with those less fortunate. Much like Han Solo and Dash Rendar before him, Cade Skywalker pre-Character Development is a fairly self-centered and selfish individual, also being a bounty hunter. Well she IS a baby after all, if not also a surprisingly and deceptively intelligent one. It's only as the game progresses that he begins to transition more to Neutral Good and then to Chaotic Neutral. However, this has the consequences of many eldar embracing the path of the ranger, leaving their craftworlds to seek adventure and freedom, putting many eldar in a chaotic light too. A wandering Samurai who just goes wherever the action is, not caring who his opponent happens to be or what their moral alignment is. Still, she's not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. In fact, since most humans are true neutral, it is the alignment of the majority of people encountered in day-to-day situations. True neutral characters will behave altruistically when it comes to friends, relatives, and allies, but for the most part will return the kind of treatment they receive from others. In my DC Universe since he starts out the same as he did in mainstream continuity, namely as a self-interested attention-seeker whose only trying to be a superhero because he thinks and hopes that it will get him fame and fortune. Shamelessly and unapologetically machiavellian, but as time goes on his ruthless and villainous side becomes less and less pronounced, until eventually he becomes more this in the form of someone who is still self-interested, but not to the same villainous extent as before. For these reasons, being nature's mediators, true neutral characters should be diplomatic and tactful, but they may also come across as being strange and enigmatic until one gets to know them and their "world view" better. But when he unexpectedlystarts to care about another person, he ends up willingly sacrificing himself to save them. At least the police force is severely low on corruption. Benson (Regular Show) Hulk (Marvel Cinematic Universe) Taffyta Muttonfudge. They're not evil, since they are pretty much only focusing on their own survival in the galaxy. I personally don't come from that school of thought, but it's an argument I can sympathize with at least, so I'll ultimately judge Galactus to be in-between this and Neutral Evil. Dash essentially shows what Han Solo was pre character development, being a smuggler who is by no means evil but is also not terribly interested in being good either. 7. That said, they swing back and fourth between Lawful and Chaotic so much that it is hard putting the whole race under either label. Can't say anything about the way he was in the first few Soul Calibur games, but in SCIV at least he's interested primarily with getting back his lost soul which frankly isn't that villainous a goal. His clone, who is barely interested in the rebellion anymore than he is in the Empire and is most concerned with finding Juno Eclipse and coming to better terms with who he is. He helps the Rebel Alliance around the time of Empire Strikes Back, but more for money than ideology. Well, he IS a bounty hunter after all, and one that definitely seems to be out for his own. From Yamaguchi to Daichi, here are all the members of Karasuno from Haikyuu!! True Neutral characters WILL pick a side if they are forced to, and usually side with good over evil (since the average person would rather have a good person looking after them than an evil one). Middle-Neutral is a character that simply just doesn't care that much about good or evil or law or chaos. If someone treats a true neutral character well, they can expect that character to treat them well. Just a dumb kid who flew too close to the sun. They are twin girls and the youngest children of Isshin and Masaki, and they have nothing to do with Soul Reapers, hollows, plots, or anything else. True Neutral characters WILL pick a side if they are forced to, and usually side with good over evil (since the average person would rather have a good person looking after them than an evil one). It should be noted that he does display a clear disapproval of some of the more morally objectionable things he's made to do throughout his quest, however. He just wants to get back home and will fight anyone who gets in his way regardless of their moral alignment. In essence True Neutral characters are a more mild and innocent Neutral Evil in that they are chiefly self-interested, but not to a ruthless, cruel, or well, evil degree. Neutral good characters, on the other hand, will behave altruistically even when dealing with others who are not friends or relatives, and may even forgive enemies that have done them grievous harm in the past (provided their enemy has truly mended his ways). Supports the law when advantageous to do so. As such his fitting this should surprise nobody. That is to say that in big conflicts between good and evil True Neutral characters try to remain well, neutral, as much as possible. Subtle mind control and multiple personalities are involved. Sometimes this, depending on the episode. He will follow the law unless breaking it is in his best interest and he's reasonably sure that he will not be caught. By the time Anakin runs into him again in Attack of the Clones he's become this. He will help those in need if it is in his best interest and works well alone or in a group. A True Neutral scientist may work for the good guys because it furthers their research, but they may also work for the bad guys for the same reason. Most anime characters can also be sorted into this system. Killing a host who has provided you food or shelter. Well she IS a baby after all, if not also a surprisingly and deceptively intelligent one. True neutral characters are concerned with their own well-being and that of the group or organization which aids them. All images MUST now have proper attribution, those who neglect to assign at least the "fair use" licensing to an image may have it deleted. 10. November 1990: 74-78. Peter Parker starts out as a Type 11 True Neutral, and continues to be this even after acquiring the special ability as, Most of John Anderton's temporary allies in, Captain Renault may be a better example. Another possible example would be Lorne, who often seems to see himself as morally obliged to lend his powers to anyone who asks, even if they're very evil, on the grounds that he's just an instrument of fate. She's fiercely loyal to her crew and isn't entirely cold-blooded; however, she has demonstrated a ruthless sort of pragmatism on various occasions. They shift allegiance artfully to preserve their borders against the advances of both sides in a conflict. Like Roxas she starts out as this and honestly is this for most of the game before ultimately ending as Neutral Good. It's also worth mentioning that shortly after Anakin won his freedom he gave Shimi hers. Even the Dwarves in the Hobbit are still kind of self-interested for the most part, and in all I feel that the Dwarves having such an isolationist and at times greedy mindset makes them more this. Prior to his Character Development Han Solo is a thoroughly self-interested smuggler who does not at all like the idea of getting involved in a conflict between the Rebellion and the Empire (and says as much to Leia) and only does get involved for the monetary reward.